Heart rate monitors are incredibly useful devices, especially for those who do lots of exercise. The Apple Watch heart rate monitor is great for people starting out, but eventually, you may want something that gives you more accurate and precise information. An external heart rate monitor is the best way to get more accurate measurements.
There are loads of reasons to grab an external heart rate monitor beyond just being more accurate. Using an Apple Watch to measure your health can drain the battery on longer workouts, whereas an external device can last a lot longer with its dedicated battery. Data is more detailed as well, so you can learn more about your health when in use.
A device like the Scosche Rhythm+ 2.0 might cost a little on top of your already expensive best Apple Watch, but it will give you the vital information that you need to paint a more vivid picture of your health. Our favorite heart rate monitors can help you find your limit, and let you push in a more safe manner.
We have tested the Scosche Rhythm+ Monitor Armband and can safely consider it the best heart rate monitor for Apple Watch. The device connects to an adjustable neoprene strap, and it is dustproof and IP68 waterproof, which means it can be submerged up to 1.5 meters for 30 minutes. While you can wear it anywhere on your arm, Scosche recommends the forearm. (I did my initial tests with it in that location, as well). The first generation Rhythm+ had a strong 8-hour battery life, but the new Rhythm+ 2.0 version can do around 24 hours of workout time before it needs a recharge, which is even more impressive.
Both the dark gray tracker and strap are slim and stylish, given that you’ll likely be wearing them in a visible location on your arm. You can slip a shirt on over the Rhythm+ if you want to hide it, but it’s a nice enough looking tracker to leave it visible. It does look a little goofy when both the Apple Watch and tracker are on the same arm, but until we have magical nanobot implants, such is our connected device lifestyle.
In practice, it’s significantly more comfortable than wearing a chest strap during heavy-duty workouts while being about as accurate. The Rhythm+ uses green and yellow oximeter sensors (described as “PerformTek biometric sensor technology”) to get a more precise look at your heart rate and blood flow than just the Apple Watch’s green sensors alone. Having more sensors also means that it updates much more frequently than the Apple Watch.
I wore the Rhythm+ 2.0 for about a week along with my Apple Watch, for my regular walks and elliptical workouts. It was fairly accurate and measured more frequently than my Apple Watch did, so it was only off by one or two points. The only real concern with the Rhythm+ 2.0 is that it can get a little tight if you do arm-related exercises, since the neoprene strap does flex and stretch, but it only gives so much.
Unlike many other chest strap options, Scosche doesn’t offer a dedicated app for viewing your recorded heart rate data. Instead, you can look at it in Apple’s Activity or Health apps, or download a third-party option like Cardiogram. If you want to save some dough, the first generation Rhythm+ is also still available for slightly less — just be warned that it will only have eight hours of battery life versus the 24 hours of the latest version. The new Rhythm+ 2.0 also uses the same charging cradle as the Rhythm24, which we mention below.
If you’re looking to get better heart monitoring without going full in on the chest strap, get this forearm monitoring instead.
The H10 connects to your iPhone or Apple Watch using Bluetooth LE, though you’ll want to use one of Polar’s apps to get Polar’s specific readings — I used Polar Beat. It’s not my favorite app (and requires an in-app purchase if you want to see your heart rate/fat burn breakdown), but it does the trick. Your heart tracking will also log in to Apple’s Health app after you connect it, allowing you to take your fitness data elsewhere. And if you’re not near a connected device, the H10 has a small amount of onboard storage, allowing you to log a workout even without your devices present.
Note: We’ve seen several users run into an issue where the H10 appears on the iPhone, but not the Apple Watch. To fix this, you’ll want to pair the H10 to the Apple Watch first before connecting it to your iPhone — or disable Bluetooth on your iPhone from the Settings app before attempting to pair with Apple Watch.
Polar’s H10 was by far the most accurate of the fitness trackers I tried, but it does come at the expense of having to wear a chest strap. During a run or weight training session, this shouldn’t bother you, but full-contact sports might be a bit much. For me, anything strapped to my chest in roller derby is a potential bruising hazard — and I’ve seen enough cracked sternums to want to avoid that fate at all costs.
So if you can get past the fact that this has to be worn around your chest, it can be considered another of the best external heart rate monitors for Apple Watch. This water-resistant chest strap is comfortable and offers electrode-based heart monitoring, so it’s more accurate than others.
The Rhythm24 has seven different monitor modes for different training options. You can set it for running, cycling, swimming, or just tracking your heart rate or heart rate variability for identifying stress and recovery during training. If you’re training for a duathlon or triathlon, set one of the multi-modes, and it will track each of your different activities.
You can record your workout and save your training data to understand better where you need improvement. Like the Rhythm+, which is still the best external heart rate monitor for Apple Watch, it uses yellow and green optical sensors for better accuracy with all skin tones.
I tested the Rhythm24 with daily running sessions alongside my Apple Watch. I found that the Rhythm24 was always more accurate, monitoring every heartbeat in real-time instead of updating with new information already behind by the time it synced.
The Rhythm24 uses the same type of armband used with the Rhythm+. I found it very comfortable during my runs but have not tried it with weight training exercises. It also has a battery status indicator, so you’ll know if it’s time to recharge. This heart rate monitor armband has 13 hours of continuous memory storage, so leave your phone behind when you’re training.
This is another heart rate monitor that sits around your chest, albeit one with a slightly smaller footprint. It’s no wider than the already narrow strap, letting you stay more comfortable during training.
It’s best used for the likes of running, cycling, swimming, and more intensive activities. It uses a single CR2032 battery to keep going, and it can last up to a year if only used for an hour a day. It’ll connect to a Garmin smartwatch, and it even stores data inside itself if you leave your phone or watch at home.
It’s not just a Heart rate monitor, either. It will also measure what Garmin calls ‘Running Dynamics’, helping you improve your form. This feature requires you to use a compatible Garmin smartwatch, but it could be very helpful.
The Garmin HRM-Pro Plus is a comfortable heart rate monitor perfect for training while running, cycling, or swimming.
If you want to have the heart rate monitor, champions like Team INEOS, Ironman World Champion Jan Frodeno, Heather Jackson, and American Pro Mountain Biker Sonya Looney have, then check out the Wahoo TICKR FIT.
The TICKR FIT is an armband that works best on your forearm, and you can get personalized heart rate training for more efficient workouts. With TICKR FIT, you’ll track and capture your heart rate in real-time and see your training zones and calories burned on your iPhone through over 50 compatible apps since it utilizes Bluetooth/ANT+. This means it will work with not only your iPhone but tablets, GPS watches, and bike computers by Wahoo, Polar, Garmin, Apple, and many more.
If you use the Wahoo Fitness app with the TICKR FIT, you can automatically upload that data into your preferred training platform of choice, like Strava. And while it seems geared more toward cycling, the TICKR FIT works well with any form of exercise. The TICKR FIT is quite accurate, comfortable, and stays in place as you exercise.
TICKR FIT is comfortable and secure. It works with over 50 apps and connects to most devices for a personalized experience.
Do I really need an external heart rate monitor for my Apple Watch?
You can always trust iMore.
Our team of Apple experts have years of experience testing all kinds of tech and gadgets, so you can be sure our recommendations and criticisms are accurate and helpful. Find out more about how we test.
Heart rate monitoring on the Apple Watch comes at the expense of battery life — the smartwatch’s health sensors account for a large majority of battery drain. As such, Apple limits how often the sensor records data, even during workouts. At rest, you’ll get heart rate data every 10 minutes. During workouts, you’re likely to get recordings every 10 seconds to a minute.
The wrist-based monitor can also get tripped up if you tend to do many exercises involving wrist bending or quick movement. The oximeter works by measuring the movement of your blood using light. When you flex your wrist, you can momentarily change that circulation, leading to erroneous heart readings. If you’ve ever seen an Apple Watch reading of “65bpm” or lower or a gray number when you’re in the middle of a high-intensity workout, that’s likely what has happened.
If you’re worried about your Apple Watch’s battery life during a lengthy workout (like a marathon, for instance), or you’d like more consistent and quick readings, consider an external heart rate monitor. These Bluetooth accessories often run off quick charges or watch batteries and offer faster readings from a location with better circulation (like the chest or upper arm). If you don’t have an Apple Watch, you can use external monitors with your best iPhone to get valuable heart rate data.
If I don’t do extremely long or intense workouts, is the Apple Watch a good enough heart rate monitor?
In that case, yes, your Apple Watch is probably good enough. If you feel that the data you’re getting from your Apple Watch is sufficiently detailed and accurate, and your workouts aren’t draining your Apple Watch battery, then you probably don’t need an external heart rate monitor.
Which external heart rate monitor should I get?
The Scosche Rhythm+ 2.0 monitor armband is the best external heart rate monitor for Apple Watch because it’s a reliable, accurate, and affordable monitor that’s perfect for amateurs and fitness fanatics alike. Not only that, but it’s also an eye-catching accessory that’s bound to turn heads while you work up a sweat.
Plus, it’s significantly more comfortable than wearing a chest strap during heavy-duty workouts while being just as accurate. The Rhythm+ uses green and yellow oximeter sensors (described as “PerformTek biometric sensor technology”) to get a more precise look at your heart rate than the Apple Watch’s green sensors alone and records data much more frequently.
The first generation of the Rhythm+ has an eight-hour battery life, but Scosche went further and made the Rhythm+ 2.0 last three times as much, so you can get 24 hours of workouts before having to plug it back in. And another great thing about Rhythm+ is the fact that since Scosche doesn’t have its own dedicated app, your data just syncs directly with Apple Health — no other app is really needed.